Croatia, Albania and Macedonia await NATO invites - Instablogs
Croatia, Albania and Macedonia await NATO invites
Edward , London: Mar 20 2008
Made Popular Mar 20 2008
Croatia :

Membership of NATO remains a goal for most of the countries that once comprised the former Yugoslavia. Till now, Slovenia is the only country which has been invited to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, a step which went hand in hand with its entry into the European Union during the Spring of 2004. When will the gates be opened for Croatia, Albania and Macedonia, three countries who are well on their way to joining, and what will the future hold for those who are further down the pecking list or not sure about membership, like Montenegro, Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo?

Croatia, Albania and Macedonia await NATO invitesCroatia awaits the visit of American President George W. Bush to Zagreb during the first week of April. Whilst Croatian public sentiment is certainly not supportive of Bush, he is seen as a fool rather than a villain, as is the case over the border in Serbia because of Bush’s support for Kosovo’s independence drive. Croatia has not been influenced too badly by Bush’s chaotic and catastrophic War on Terrorism and as such his visit should, with the exception of some inevitable protests, be seen as a positive step for the Croatian government. Whether you like him or not, Bush’s presence still carries prestige and recognition. It is expected that during the NATO summit in Romania prior to Bush’s arrival Croatia will be offered membership to the organisation.

Whilst Albania was never part of Yugoslavia, despite plans for its acquisition by Tito during the late 1940s, the country is becoming ever more tied to the fortunes of other countries in the Balkans such as Macedonia and Croatia. This is partly because many Albanians live on the other side of Albania’s borders in Macedonia, Greece, Montenegro and Kosovo, but also for the simple fact that the Balkans isn’t a huge place, meaning that a country’s fate is influenced by those nearby. Albania has sensibly avoided becoming involved unnecessarily in the current Kosovo crisis and this is sure to be noticed and no doubt rewarded. Ongoing reforms across Albania are still essential, as shown by the explosions last week at an arms dump, but Albania is making solid progress and will most likely receive an invitation alongside Croatia.

Greece has already given Albania assurances this week that it will support them in achieving membership, but the same can not be said for Macedonia with the Greek Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis claiming that the name dispute between the two countries could be an impossible obstacle to surmount. An invitation of membership to NATO can be blocked by any member so it is essential that Macedonia solves this problem immediately. How is this to be done though, since by changing one’s name, a name which now has a fully fledged national identity attached to it, one can not help but feel that Macedonia is selling itself short. Is it not time that Greece was put in its place by other senior members of NATO who have seen no reason not to recognise Macedonia by its constitutional name “Republic of Macedonia”, such as the United States and the United Kingdom.

Other countries in the region face greater uncertainty. Montenegro has pinned its hopes on joining in 2012, which seems to be achievable so long as the country continues to tread the Western path that it is walking along currently. The situation for Bosnia is a little less clear since whilst the country has made known its intentions to push for membership it is any body’s guess when this would be likely to come into fruition. The country is still ravaged by a huge divide, separating it into two separate political entities, one for Serbs and the other for Muslims and Croats. Aside from the political division it is also clear that social divisions within the country are huge, firstly between the three ethnicities but also along other lines such as the urban-rural divide. The Bosnian Serbs were also on the receiving end of NATO air strikes in 1995 so it is unlikely that they will wish to cooperate either. Similarly, Serbia, a country which suffered at the hands of an 11 week NATO campaign in 1999, has shown lukewarm interest in joining and polls within the country show that the populous categorically reject it. The current situation with Kosovo will only harden the resolve of the Serbs. The potential for the the newly independent Kosovo to join NATO is still largely a pipe-dream, that is not to say that with concerted effort, cooperation from the international community and a little good will, especially with regards to Russian objections to UN membership, the situation could have changed ten years from now.

The quest to join NATO is not universally supported by those people who live in Croatia, Albania and Macedonia. They are perfectly aware that by joining NATO it could be inferred that they are offering themselves as toys to be placed in George W. Bush’s cot. Sadly this may well be the case, but this is still probably preferable to Russia, the playground bully, getting its hands on them.

Albanian Government report
AFP report on Bush’s visit to Croatia
Makfax article on Macedonia-Greece name dispute affecting NATO membership

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
0 Stars
Rudolf irokoproductions.com
New York, United States
What happens when everyone joins NATO?
1 Stars
Andrewh1112
Oslo, Norway
Everyone? Your comment makes no sense. It’s not like they’re the last countries outside NATO anyway.

Besides that even if everyone did join the pact says all the members have to come to the aid of a member under attack regardless of who the agressor is... if Denmark attacked Germany, NATO would have to fight the Danes regardless of their NATO membership.

Do you even know where these countries are? Or how small they are? The European Union is taking more steps towards the goal of having a Continental army - and protecting European territory. These countries belong to the European community and will become EU members in the future.

Eventually NATO will just have two armies: the US and the EU. That is *if* NATO survives. Many Europeans see NATO as a relic and an American proxy.
1 Stars
Rudolf irokoproductions.com
New York, United States
So if Germany attacks Poland, which is more like what will happen, U.S will attack Germany? From U.S base in Germany?

My real concern is that the pact is being watered down with this endless expansion. I understand the need to protect the small new countries from Russia but how do you explain the fact that the more NATO expands the harder it is for NATO to find troops to its mission.

Eventually the expansion will end or else...
1 Stars
Andrewh1112
Oslo, Norway
In all seriousness do you really think NATO members are likely to attack each other? The members are members because they have something in common. The new members would also have to be vetted - and they do have ”sponsors” you know. The EU is the perfect example - conflict is no longer possible or productive because of the economic and social integration.

And if the new members start acting up they’ll get scorn from both NATO and the EU. If it’s one thing they want it’s economic integration with the EU. If you’re a naughty boy you’ll get kicked out of the club.

The expansion is of course worrisome if you really believe it is a defensive pact. In my opinion NATO has been abused by the US to further American political goals. NATO is not supposed to be an American proxy - a bunch of serfs to the feudal lord. However now it’s shaping up to become just a group for ”action” where the UN fails to act. I don’t see that stated anywhere in the founding treaty.

Protecting countries from Russia is not the issue. Russia has no intentions of taking new countries - it has no need for them now. The Eastern Block was a buffer zone for them. Now that the EU is firmly in their economic resource grip they can rest easy. Germany has long since been neutered.

This is all about power. Russia is looking for it’s glory days. And it’s actually coming sooner rather than later. But the power is not military - but economical and political. If you know how the Serbs and Russians feel about each other you will understand the ”need” for Russia to have power in that region of Europe. It’s a deep kinship to say the least.

The fact that NATO members are not willing to commit troops speaks volumes of the problems I outlined above. No wonder we don’t want to supply troops to wars America wants fought. The whole pact was founded on the principals of mutual protection in war. The ”war on terror” is not a war. I for one would seriously like to see the EU speed up the work it’s doing on the military wing (WEU) and quit NATO altogether. If the US wants to fight wars it should pay the price in blood too.

The US was attacked by a small terrorist group. Defeating al-Quaida is not done by invading Afghanistan or Iraq. And that’s what American wants, right? You can’t fight terrorists with a regular army.
1 Stars
Edward balkanbaby.blogspot...
London, United Kingdom
Andrewh1112, War is now very unlikely between members of NATO, clearly the idea of Germany invading Denmark or Spain conquoring Portugal is ridiculous. On the otherhand, how close did we come to war over Cyprus? Both Greece and Turkey were NATO members and this episode caused real strains within the organisation. It’s hard to predict where such a case could occur in the future but Kosovo is brewing in the background and members are indeed divided over this. I’m not saying that it will ever come to war, purely that there is the potential for real dispute if the stakes are high enough, as they were in Cyprus.
1 Stars
Andrewh1112
Oslo, Norway
You make an interesting point there, Edward. However does it not also prove the very point I was making? That Turkey and Greece are unable to go to war because of their NATO membership?

Or more importantly that Turkey would loose any and all hope of joining the EU if it attacked Greece.

Turkey and Greece have after all ”fought” with other means for some time now. A full scale war is unthinkable and probably impossible to win.

In some ways NATO membership is seen as a stepping stone towards EU membership. After all if you are going to become ”family”, you better put your weapons down or join us.

And Turkey is the odd man out in the alliance. Why did we bring Turkey into NATO? And why does America fight so hard to force Turkey on us Europeans? Why does Turkey call in favors from the US in their struggle to become members of the EU?

Turkey does not make sense in the current situation. The Cold War is over and Turkey has no real strategic defensive value to NATO. It does however have a very good location for American policy expansion and power projection in the Middle East. But are those goals the same as NATO’s?
Add your Comment